<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bernard Gauthier - Latest Comments in Ad Clutter: A not so modern dilemma</title><link>http://bernardgauthier.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bernardgauthier.disqus.com/ad_clutter_a_not_so_modern_dilemma/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:21:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ad Clutter: A not so modern dilemma</title><link>http://www.bernardgauthier.ca/?p=4#comment-3609188</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem of ad clutter is not new, but the ability to avoid that clutter certainly is.  We've got more noise than ever, but also more signal - MSN, Facebook, iTunes, Youtube, etc., etc.  Because we're consuming so much information in a digital medium (not just internet, but cable, iPods, etc.) the ability to filter signal from noise  in terms of PVRs, popup blockers, personal playlists and the like is a completely new phenomenon, and one that is scaring advertisers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're right that a well-crafted message can break through, but it has to be more than just a message.  It has to be entertaining, educational, beneficial.  As advertisers, our new currency is utility as we struggle to keep buying eyeballs in an attention economy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:21:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>