<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bernard Gauthier - Latest Comments in The Conservative website: Stephen Harper is seeing red</title><link>http://bernardgauthier.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://bernardgauthier.disqus.com/the_conservative_website_stephen_harper_is_seeing_red/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:17:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Conservative website: Stephen Harper is seeing red</title><link>http://www.bernardgauthier.ca/?p=10#comment-24011179</link><description>Reading this article was like reading &lt;a href="http://seocontest2008.me.uk/" rel="nofollow"&gt;content freelancer&lt;/a&gt; books to be honest. I don't know if I can say I enjoyed it entirely but you really touched a few really good points in my opinion. Thus so I suggest to keep doing this job and I'll come back on you in the near future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JoeAnne11</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:17:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Conservative website: Stephen Harper is seeing red</title><link>http://www.bernardgauthier.ca/?p=10#comment-3609515</link><description>One of the things that has always bothered me about both sites is that they are just what you said.  Strong branding, clear messages, text and photos.  Nothing at all remarkable about either one of them.  The next election is going to be won or lost online, and both parties are going to have to look beyond "we could... start a blog" for their web strategy.  If I didn't abhor politics and even moreso, politicians, I feel like I could make a LOT of money as a political web strategist.  Someone will - that's for sure.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:18:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
